Content and authors
Articles, basic pages and other agreed content types, with their titles, text, publishing state and author references. Custom fields need an explicit destination.
Drupal migration
An article, a staff profile and an event may look like three pages on your website. In Drupal, they can have different fields, relationships and publishing rules. Review where each record belongs before launching the migration.
Leaving Drupal: choose the destination for each content type before exporting. A staff directory needs fields and relationships that an ordinary article may not have. See Drupal to WordPress for that route.
Moving into Drupal: prepare the bundles, fields and vocabularies that will receive the records. Start with WordPress to Drupal if that is your source. Upgrading an existing Drupal installation is a separate scope from transferring its content to another CMS.
Available migration objects and capabilities depend on the selected source and target systems. Check current integration status before using this planning guide.
Assess migrations from Drupal and into a prepared Drupal site. The starting point is your Drupal version, content types and enabled modules. Source access may use JSON:API where available or a version-compatible Bridge; the destination connection is checked separately.
Articles, basic pages and other agreed content types, with their titles, text, publishing state and author references. Custom fields need an explicit destination.
Vocabulary terms, their hierarchy, content assignments and supported menus. A menu link must point to the new record, even when its URL changes.
Image and document availability, inline links and relationships between records. Private files need an agreed access method.
Current aliases and any available redirect history. Use the actual public URLs to prepare the destination routes.
Views, Layout Builder sections, theme templates and module behavior need their own implementation on the destination. Paragraphs, revision history, moderation and translations are reviewed individually. Do not assume that a node export contains everything those features need.
Consider a Drupal “Staff profile” with a job title, portrait and department reference. Turning it into a plain WordPress page would keep the visible text, but could leave your team maintaining the department directory by hand.
A better mapping might use a prepared staff post type, a job-title field and a department taxonomy. That is an illustrative design choice, not an automatic conversion: the destination fields and templates must exist, and the migration needs permission to write them. The Drupal to WordPress guide covers the field-by-field decisions.
Take a profile that refers to a department and a private document. After the trial, open the department directory and follow its link to the profile. Confirm that the title and portrait appear, the department reference resolves, and an anonymous visitor cannot retrieve the private document.
Then edit the profile in the destination. If the department exists only as text pasted into the body, the relationship has been lost even though the page looks right. Record that as a mapping issue in the validation report. If the destination cannot preserve the file restriction, hold the affected content until access is implemented.
The destination needs its content types, fields, languages and permissions before migration starts. An incoming category might become a term in an existing vocabulary; a product feature list might need several fields. Those decisions belong in the mapping, alongside who will build the corresponding display.
For a WordPress source, begin with WordPress to Drupal. A Drupal version upgrade is a separate assessment: we need to know which configuration, contributed modules and historical data the project expects to retain.
Send the site URL, Drupal version, intended destination and a rough count by content type. Add the names of modules that own essential content, such as directories or document libraries. Screenshots of field settings can help explain the model; credentials are not needed in the enquiry.
A small site with heavily nested records can need more mapping work than a large article archive. See the cost factors and timeline dependencies before choosing a package.
Scope is reviewed against the source and destination documentation available for the project.
Clear answers
Yes, subject to review. Specify the content types or sections to move, then check their dependencies. An article may still need an author, a taxonomy term or a file from outside the selected section.
You can plan to retain suitable paths or map changed addresses to the relevant new page. The implementation and testing are agreed with whoever controls the destination website and redirects.
Next step
Get an estimate based on the type, volume, and complexity of the data you want to migrate. Select the source and target systems, enter the migration details, and receive a calculated estimate. Online payment activation is being prepared. Until automated payment processing is available, plan activation and billing may be handled through a separate onboarding process.