Editorial content
Pages, posts, articles, custom types, publication state, dates, excerpts, and authors.
CMS migration platform
Move pages, structured content, media, users, metadata and relationships into a prepared CMS. Review the source, approve the destination model, test representative records, and validate URLs and search signals before the final transfer.
Available migration objects and capabilities depend on the selected source and target systems. Check current integration status before using this planning guide.
Start with what your editors need to keep: published pages, archive content, authors, categories and files. Check what the source can provide and what the destination can accept, then put the included records and exceptions in the proposal.
Pages, posts, articles, custom types, publication state, dates, excerpts, and authors.
Fields, taxonomies, categories, tags, relationships, references, and reusable content.
Images, documents, alt text, supported users, roles, and ownership.
Slugs, titles, descriptions, canonicals, internal links, source URLs, and redirects.
Visual design, templates, application functionality, unsupported plugins, forms, checkout behavior, and destination development are not assumed to transfer automatically. They are documented and quoted separately when needed.
A staff directory can look like a set of ordinary pages while depending on job titles, departments and profile images stored in separate fields. If those fields disappear into the page body, the new directory may become harder to maintain.
Agree the destination structure before loading it. That may mean ordinary posts and categories, or prepared content types and relationships. The mapping guide includes a worksheet for recording those decisions.
Choose an old article with several images, a page with related content and any record with unusual formatting or restricted access. A trial with only the easiest pages cannot tell you much about the rest of the archive.
Review the result in the destination, record what failed and agree the fixes. The validation report example shows how unresolved issues remain visible before launch.
Review WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, Ghost or Strapi for the decisions specific to those platforms. If addresses will change, include the SEO migration work in the scope from the start.
A custom CMS migration needs one plan for the content model and another for search continuity. Treating either as an afterthought creates avoidable rework.
Inventory custom content types, fields, relationships, APIs, database tables, files, permissions, and rendering dependencies before committing to a transfer path.
Map source entities into destination-native types, fields, taxonomies, components, authors, and relationships instead of flattening structured data into page bodies.
Preserve useful content, titles, descriptions, canonicals, internal links, and indexation rules; map changed URLs to relevant destinations and test redirects.
Use representative dry runs, record reconciliation, rendered-page review, crawl checks, and an exception register before approving cutover.
Confirm these inputs before scheduling the first migration run.
List every required entity, field, relationship, asset, user group, language, URL family, and explicit exclusion.
Confirm a supported API, export, database, file, or bridge path and test destination authorization.
Prepare destination types, fields, templates, permissions, upload limits, workflows, integrations, and staging ownership.
Export indexable URLs, metadata, canonicals, internal links, sitemaps, backlinks, and redirect requirements.
Define count checks, representative samples, required fields, relationship checks, page QA, and acceptance evidence.
Assign owners for content freeze or delta rules, backups, launch checks, rollback triggers, monitoring, and final approval.
Clear answers
Yes, when the source values and destination model can be mapped consistently. Validate representative complex records before production.
No. Data migration can populate a prepared destination, while theme, component, and template development remain a separate workstream.
Users can often be migrated. Password portability depends on the hashing and authentication models; incompatible hashes require a secure reset process.
Inventory source URLs, define one-to-one destinations where possible, test redirect coverage, and monitor launch errors.
Next step
Migranetix separates migration planning, data mapping, testing, validation, and final transfer into a controlled workflow. Customers can review the planned changes before launching the final migration.