K2 migration guide

Joomla K2 to WordPress migration

K2 is a separate stable Migranetix connector with its own entities and mapping contract. Direction availability does not make every extra-field type, override, plugin, or route automatically equivalent to WordPress.

Treat K2 as a distinct source model

K2 items are not guaranteed Joomla core articles. Use the dedicated connector and inventory K2-owned tables, relationships, configuration, plugins, and overrides before selecting a WordPress destination.

Inventory every K2 entity and dependency

Count items, categories, tags, extra fields and groups, images, galleries, attachments, authors, comments, aliases, states, featured values, access, languages, and menu routes. Identify custom tables and plugins outside the standard connector.

Choose the WordPress model before loading

Decide which K2 item groups become posts, pages, or custom post types. Prepare taxonomies, fields, users, comments, media ownership, status rules, languages, SEO storage, and permalinks.

Map fields and relationships by stable keys

Map category hierarchy, tags, authors, dates, state, featured behavior, access, language, comments, and item relationships. Map extra fields through stable source keys and field types; document unsupported or transformed values.

A stable connector does not remove mapping work.

Transfer images and attachments with ownership

Discover item images, inline images, galleries, and attachments; validate each file; upload accepted assets; connect destination IDs; rewrite references; and record missing or rejected files.

Reconstruct K2 routes and validate complex samples

Crawl public K2 URLs because aliases, categories, menus, Itemid, languages, plugins, and router behavior can affect them. Dry run representative field groups, nested categories, attachments, comments, and routes before full loading.

Reconcile K2-specific counts and validate rendering, relationships, media, URLs, redirects, and exceptions.

Connect K2 work to the full Joomla plan

Template overrides, plugins, modules, forms, search behavior, and frontend application logic require separate implementation. Continue with the migration scope, Joomla vs WordPress comparison, core import guide, K2 guide, redirect and SEO guide, and cost guide, plus the mapping and validation guides.

Clear answers

Frequently asked questions

The live Migranetix catalog lists K2 as a stable source and target integration. Actual record fit still depends on access, fields, plugins, destination design, and validation.

No. Route each item group to an approved post, page, or custom post type.

Each field type, group, value format, repeatability, and destination storage needs explicit mapping and exceptions.

No. They require WordPress-native implementation.

Reconcile entity counts, inspect complex field groups and relationships, verify assets and routes, and document every exception.

Next step

Assess your Joomla K2 migration

Analyze the K2 entities, destination model, field mappings, assets, URLs, and validation scope in the app.